• August 25, 2025
  • iBirds Software Services
  • 0

Email has become one of the most powerful tools in Salesforce. It is used for sending important updates, alerts, and reminders to customers, brokers, and partners. But Salesforce has a fixed restriction where only five thousand emails can be sent per day per org using the default sendEmail() function. This looks fine for small businesses but for growing organizations, this limit soon becomes a big barrier. What starts as a technical restriction often grows into a serious operational challenge that can block business communication and create delays.


The 5K Email Wall

The beginning, sending emails from Salesforce worked without any problem. Simple flows and Apex triggers were used to send welcome messages, approval notifications, and reminders for missing documents. Everything worked smoothly until the usage increased. Once more teams started using Salesforce for communication, emails silently stopped reaching their destination. After a detailed check, we realized that the five thousand daily cap was the main reason. There was no soft warning, no retry system, and no clear message to the sender. Critical broker emails failed, business workflows were paused, and team confidence in the platform was affected. What looked like a system limit turned into a business risk because missed emails meant missed opportunities and delayed processes.

Challenges Faced by Organizations

When we faced this issue, the first thought was to search for a quick fix. Native workarounds like spacing out emails or using batch jobs were explored, but the hard limit was still there and once it was hit no further emails were sent. External platforms like SendGrid and Marketing Cloud were also considered, but they created new problems such as high costs, security concerns, integration delays, and a mismatch with transactional needs. Writing more custom Apex logic was another option but it would have increased technical complexity, required extra developer support, and created a heavy dependency on code changes for every new business case. All these approaches proved that the real solution was not just about sending more emails. It required a complete redesign where email generation could be separated from delivery and controlled in a scalable, secure, and flexible way.

The Design Approach

Our design strategy focused on building a system that could completely bypass the Salesforce email limit while still keeping Salesforce as the logic engine. The system had to make sure that no more emails were sent using the default sendEmail() function for high-volume communication. Instead, the data needed to be staged and pushed externally for final delivery. Another important part was configuration control. The system had to allow business teams to activate or deactivate templates and rules without the need for deployment cycles. This was possible only by using custom metadata instead of hardcoded Apex. The approach also made sure that the system could support multiple objects in Salesforce, provide error handling with retry options, and integrate with an external SMTP service for actual sending. The principle was simple: Salesforce should decide what to send while another system should decide how to send it.

The Custom Staging Solution

We designed a new staging system centered on a custom object in Salesforce. Every email request was stored as a record in this staging object instead of being sent directly. Each record contained information about the recipient, the sender, the subject, the email body, and the related Salesforce record. The record also carried a status value like pending, sent, or failed. This way, every email was queued, monitored, and reprocessed if required. The real power of the system came from metadata. By using two custom metadata types, one for email templates and another for object relationships, administrators were able to control email flows without touching any code. A dispatcher Apex class worked as the brain of the system, checking the metadata and creating the staging records with the correct details.

The final delivery of the email was handled by an external SMTP service integrated with our internal systems. This service regularly checked Salesforce for pending emails, processed them, sent them to recipients, and updated their status back in Salesforce. If an email failed due to incorrect address or template error, the system flagged it for retry. Detailed error logs were maintained so that administrators could track what failed and why. This made the system not only scalable but also transparent, giving full control and visibility to business teams.

Results and Benefits

The difference after implementing the staging system was immediate. Before the change, emails were blocked after five thousand sends with no retry or alert mechanism. After the new system, emails were sent without limit, monitored with clear statuses, and retried automatically if they failed. Reliability increased as business teams trusted that every important message would reach its destination. Flexibility also improved because new templates or rules could be configured through metadata without any developer work. Scaling communication became smooth as thousands of emails were processed daily without putting extra load on Salesforce.

Lessons Learned

The biggest lesson was that separating email generation from email delivery is the only way to ensure scale and reliability. Trying to do everything inside Salesforce with sendEmail() only creates fragile systems that fail silently. Another learning was the value of metadata. By shifting control from code to configuration, the system became flexible and easy to manage. We also learned the importance of retries because failures are natural in any email process. A structured retry mechanism reduced manual work and increased trust. Designing for scale from the start also saved us from future rebuilds because the same framework is now used not only for emails but also for SMS and push notifications. Finally, providing full visibility with logs and trackers made adoption easier as teams felt confident in the process.

Final Thoughts

The Salesforce five thousand daily email cap may seem like a small problem but for growing businesses it quickly becomes a roadblock. Instead of treating it as a limitation, it can be turned into an opportunity to design a better communication system. By building a metadata-driven staging system, we created a framework that was scalable, reliable, and fully configurable. It allowed us to bypass the limit, provide complete visibility, and give control to both IT and business users. Today, our teams can configure templates, retry failed messages, and track delivery without waiting for deployments. This has not only improved communication but also increased trust in Salesforce as a platform. If your organization is facing the same issue, the best approach is to consider building a similar staging framework. iBirds Services, we help businesses design such smart solutions that handle both technical and business needs effectively.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. Why does Salesforce have a daily email limit of 5,000 emails?
Salesforce has this limit to stop spam and protect the reputation of its servers. The 5,000 limit is enough for small businesses, but for large organizations that send many transactional emails, it becomes a big challenge.

Q2. Can we increase the email limit by adding more Salesforce licenses?
No, adding more licenses does not increase the daily limit. The 5,000 emails per day limit applies to the entire org, no matter how many users you have.

Q3. Can Salesforce Marketing Cloud solve this problem?
Marketing Cloud is mainly built for bulk marketing campaigns like newsletters and promotions. While it can handle large volumes, it is not always suitable for transactional emails such as broker notifications, application updates, or onboarding alerts. It also requires extra cost and training.

Q4. Can we use external email services like SendGrid or Gmail for this?
Yes, you can connect external services, but it comes with challenges like integration, security checks, and extra costs. A custom staging system in Salesforce with SMTP integration is usually more reliable and flexible for large organizations.

Q5. Do admins need coding knowledge to manage the custom email staging system?
No, they don’t. The system is metadata-driven, which means admins can manage templates, activate or deactivate workflows, and control logic without writing Apex code. This makes it easy for non-developers to handle.Q6. Does the custom staging system remove the 5,000 email limit completely?
Yes, it does. Salesforce only stages the email data while the actual delivery happens through an external SMTP server. Since the sending is handled outside Salesforce, organizations can send unlimited emails without hitting the daily cap.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Free Demo

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.